📥 Want to turn these insights into action? Download this FREE team building resource!

16PF Personality Test

👉 TL;DR

16PF and Big Five are two distinct personality assessments, each offering unique insights. The 16PF measures 16 primary personality traits to understand an individual's behaviors, motivations, and preferences. The Big Five assesses five broad traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional stability) for personal growth and interpersonal understanding. Choosing between these tests depends on the desired outcomes and specific needs of individuals or organizations.

Looking for a test to understand your team chemistry as a whole? Try TeamDynamics instead.

As the quest to understand human personality continues, numerous assessments have been developed to help people gain insights into their character traits and behavioral patterns. Among these, the 16 Personality Factors (16PF) and the Big Five (sometimes called OCEAN or Five Factor Model) personality tests stand out as popular and widely used tools. In this blog post, we will explore the histories, methodologies, strengths, and limitations of these two assessments and provide guidance on which test might be a better fit for your needs.

History of 16PF and Big Five

The 16PF was developed by psychologist Raymond Cattell in the mid-20th century. Cattell's goal was to create a comprehensive measure of personality traits based on empirical research. He began by identifying 16 factors that, in his view, captured the essence of human personality. The test has since undergone several revisions, but its core remains grounded in Cattell's original research.

Interested in something other than the 16PF personality test? Check out the 5 best alternatives to 16 Personality Factors.

The Big Five personality test, also known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM), emerged as a consensus among personality researchers in the 1980s. The model was developed by analyzing numerous personality questionnaires and identifying five broad dimensions that accounted for most of the variance in human personality. The FFM has become one of the most widely accepted and researched models of personality in the field of psychology.

Methodologies of Big Five (OCEAN) and 16 Personality Factors

The 16PF measures 16 primary traits, each with its own bipolar continuum (e.g., warmth vs. coolness). Participants respond to a series of statements, and their responses are used to determine their standing on each of the 16 factors.

Is 16Personalities the same as 16PF? They sound similar, but no, these are two different personality test techniques. Check out our top alternatives to 16Personalities!

The Big Five assessment measures five broad dimensions of personality: Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (OCEAN). Like the 16PF, participants respond to a series of statements, and their answers are used to determine their scores on each of the five dimensions.

Strengths of 16PF and Big Five

The 16PF's strength lies in its comprehensive approach to personality assessment. By measuring 16 distinct factors, the test provides a nuanced and detailed portrait of an individual's personality, which can be valuable for self-discovery and personal growth.

The Big Five's strength comes from its strong empirical foundation and its simplicity. With only five dimensions to consider, it's easier to understand and apply the results in various personal and professional settings. The FFM is also widely researched and has demonstrated strong validity and reliability across diverse populations.

Limitations of OCEAN (Big Five) and 16 Personality Factors

The 16PF's main limitation is its complexity. With 16 factors to consider, interpreting the results can be challenging for individuals and practitioners alike. Additionally, some critics argue that the 16 factors may not fully capture the complexities of human personality.

The Big Five's primary limitation is its broad and general nature. While the simplicity of the five dimensions is a strength, it can also lead to a loss of nuance in understanding an individual's personality. Some critics argue that the Big Five may not capture all the intricacies of personality traits.

Additionally, despite how frequently both tests are administered in the workplace, neither of them is well-suited for understanding the nuances of group dynamics that sit at the heart of most modern, team-based work.

That’s why we built TeamDynamics. TeamDynamics helps you objectively assess, describe, and act on the unique ways in which your team interacts to accomplish its shared work. Put differently, TeamDynamics describes your team chemistry.

Put simply: If you're looking to understand your team's personality, there's a better choice: TeamDynamics.

Equipped with your TeamDynamics, you can take action to improve your group dynamics and performance:

Build your team by defining team culture and values, setting actionable team norms, and conducting high-impact team offsites;
Manage your team better by coaching team members, turbocharging cross-team collaboration, and resolving team conflicts;
Recruit and hire more effectively by honing your recruiting pitch, refining your interview process, and accelerating new hire onboarding;

And much more!

Which Should You Choose: 16PF vs. Big Five

The choice between the 16 Personality Factors (16PF) and the Big Five personality tests depends on your objectives and the specific context in which you intend to apply the results. Both tests have their strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these differences can help you make an informed decision. Here is a brief comparison of the two tests:

	16PF	Big Five (OCEAN)
Focus	16PF assesses an individual's personality based on 16 primary traits, which are further divided into five global factors. These factors encompass warmth, intellect, emotional stability, dominance, impulsivity, and others.	The Big Five personality test, also known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM), evaluates an individual's personality based on five broad dimensions: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (OCEAN).
Application	16PF is often used in various settings, including personal growth, career development, clinical diagnosis, and research. The test's primary goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment of an individual's personality traits.	The Big Five is widely used in psychological research, as well as in organizational and educational settings. The test aims to provide a concise and robust framework for understanding human personality.

Consider the following questions when deciding which test to use:

Are you looking for a more comprehensive and detailed assessment of personality traits? If so, the 16PF might be a better fit.
Are you more interested in a concise and widely accepted framework for understanding personality? In that case, the Big Five may be more appropriate.

It's important to recognize that both the 16PF and the Big Five have their strengths and limitations. Neither assessment should be considered the definitive measure of one's personality. Instead, they should be used as starting points for further exploration and reflection.

The Best Alternatives to 16PF and Big Five

If you’re considering alternatives to the 16PF and Big Five, here are some top options:

MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator): Provides 16 personality types based on four dichotomies, making it popular for personal and professional growth. Learn more about MBTI here.
‍Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI): Designed for workplace assessments, focusing on leadership and job performance.‍
TeamDynamics: Tailored for evaluating both individual and team behaviors, ideal for professional environments focusing on collaboration and productivity. Learn more about the 16 TeamDynamics here.‍
DiSC Profile: Offers insights into four main personality traits, commonly used for team building and communication improvement. Read about the DiSC profile here.‍
Enneagram: A nine-type model exploring core motivations and behaviors, offering deep self-awareness. Learn about Enneagram here.

These alternatives provide various perspectives on personality, allowing you to choose the most suitable one based on your specific needs.

Want a more exhaustive evaluation of alternatives? Check out our roundups of the 5 best alternatives to 16 Personality Factors (16PF) and the top 5 alternatives to the Big Five (OCEAN) personality test.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the 16PF and the Big Five personality tests offer valuable insights into human personality. While the 16PF provides a more comprehensive and detailed assessment of personality traits, the Big Five offers a concise and widely accepted framework for understanding personality. Your choice between the two depends on your specific goals and context.

However, if you're looking for an alternative approach to understanding personality and team dynamics, you might consider trying TeamDynamics. This assessment focuses on identifying individual strengths and preferences within a team context and aims to optimize team performance by leveraging each member's unique contributions. TeamDynamics can be a valuable tool for organizations and teams, as it fosters better communication, collaboration, and understanding among team members.

Ultimately, no single personality assessment can capture the full complexity of human personality. It's essential to approach these tests with a critical eye and to use them as a starting point for further self-discovery and growth. By exploring various assessments, including the 16PF, Big Five, and TeamDynamics, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of your personality and how it influences your relationships and performance in different contexts.

FAQs

1. What is the main difference between 16PF and the Big Five?

The 16PF measures 16 specific personality traits, while the Big Five (OCEAN) focuses on five broad dimensions: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism.

2. Which test is more widely used in modern psychology?

The Big Five is more widely used today, particularly in academic research and organizational settings, due to its simplicity and strong empirical support.

3. Can both tests be used for career assessment?

Yes, both 16PF and the Big Five are used in career assessments to match personality traits with suitable job roles.

4. How long does it take to complete each test?

The 16PF typically takes about 30-45 minutes, while the Big Five can vary, with some versions taking only 10-15 minutes.

5. Are the results from these tests reliable?

Both tests are considered reliable, with decades of research supporting their validity in assessing personality traits. However, the reliability can depend on the context in which the test is administered and the interpretation of the results.

6. Is there any overlap between the traits measured by 16PF and Big Five?

Yes, some overlap exists as both tests aim to capture core aspects of personality, but the 16PF provides a more detailed breakdown of traits, while the Big Five offers a broader overview.